Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank A. Weddigan et al., Respondents, v. William F. Whiting, Appellant, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 533 · caselaw · US
General
Frank A. Weddigan et al., Respondents, v. William F. Whiting, Appellant
187 N.Y. 533·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank A. Weddigan et al., Respondents, v. William F. Whiting, Appellant.
Weddigan v. Whiting, 114 Ápp. Div. 915, appeal dismissed.
(Argued January 7, 1907;
decided January 15, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 21, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs .entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was improperly taken.
E. C. Aiken for motion.
Charles F. Lyon opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and ajipeal dismissed, without costs.