General

Farr v. Thomson et al.

78 U.S. 13911 Wall. 139·Supreme Court of the United States·1870

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Farr v. Thomson et al. In which the preceding case was affirmed. [MAJORITY] The declaration in this case presented, in all substantial respects, the same state of facts as the declaration in the case just decided. After argument by Mr. M. M. Carpenter,for the plaintiff, no one appearing contra, Mr. Justice Swayne announced the judgment of the court to the effect that the former case decided this. The question certified to the.court — which was whether the declaration showed a sufficient cause of action — was accordingly answered by it In the affirmative.