Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Walker et al. v. North Carolina, 1960 — 364 U.S. 832 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Walker et al. v. North Carolina
364 U.S. 832·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 110.
Walker et al. v. North Carolina.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Arthur J. Goldberg, David E. Feller, William M. Nicholson, John Bolt Culbertson and Hugo L. Black, Jr. for petitioners. T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody and Harry W. McGalliard, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of North Carolina. Certiorari denied.