Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oklahoma et al. v. United States, 1947 — 329 U.S. 711 · caselaw · US
General
Oklahoma et al. v. United States
329 U.S. 711·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 715.
Oklahoma et al. v. United States.
January 20, 1947.
Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, Harry 0. Glasser and E. S. Champlin for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Assistant Attorney General Bazelon and Roger P. Marquis for the United States. A. B. Mitchell, Attorney General of Kansas, filed a brief for that State, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.