Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George B. Glover, Respondent, v. Lucy H. Glover, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Appellant, 1893 — 136 N.Y. 665 · caselaw · US
General
George B. Glover, Respondent, v. Lucy H. Glover, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Appellant
136 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George B. Glover, Respondent, v. Lucy H. Glover, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Appellant.
(Argued December 13, 1892;
decided January 17, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of tlie General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made August 3, 1892, which overruled exceptions taken by defendant on the trial and ordered judgment on verdict in favor of plaintiff directed by the court.
FramMin B. Lord for appellant.
Flamen B. Ccmdler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.