Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Land et al. v. Dollar et al.; and In re Killion, 1952 — 344 U.S. 806 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Land et al. v. Dollar et al.; and In re Killion
344 U.S. 806·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1.
No. 2.
Land et al. v. Dollar et al.; and In re Killion.
Attorney General McGranery for Land et al., petitioners in No. 1.
Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner in No. 2.
Herman Phleger, Gregory A. Harrison, Moses Lasky, Edmund L. Jones and Howard Boyd for Dollar et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
On writs of certiorari, 341 U. S. 737, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Dismissed on motions of counsel for petitioners.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Reported below: See 88 U. S. App. D. C. 311, 190 F. 2d 366.