General
Mary VERES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KNICKERBOCKER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
30 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary VERES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KNICKERBOCKER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Decided February 18, 1929.
No. 188.
Shipman & Goodwin, of Hartford, Conn. (George H. Day, of Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for appellant.
Greenstein & Schwartz, of Bridgeport, Conn., and Chapnick & Sperandeo, of New Haven, Conn. (Harry Schwartz, of Bridgeport, Conn., and John M. Chapnick, of New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.