Charles C. SCALIONE, Appellant, v. Carl BOSCH, Appellee

12 F.2d 172·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1926

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Charles C. SCALIONE, Appellant, v. Carl BOSCH, Appellee. (Court of Appeals of District of Columbia. Submitted March 8, 1926. Decided April 5, 1926.) No. 1825. Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices. [MAJORITY — ROBB, J. Associate Justice.] ROBB, J. Associate Justice. This interfer- ence involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Bosch that were involved in the prior interference, patent appeal No. 1824, — App. D. C. — , 12 F.(2d) 171, just decided, and the same contentions are made. It follows that the rulings made in that case are controlling here, and accordingly the decision is affirmed. Affirmed.