Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Holmes et al. v. Eddy et al.; Nehring v. Gerrity; Easter v. Ziff et al.; Scalza v. United States; Jones, Administrator v. United States; Stello v. Pennsylvania; Gillentine v. United States; Herr et al. v. United States; Trantino v. New Jersey; Bowden v. California Adult Authority et al.; Vida v. Roth, U. S. District Judge; Skolnick v. Hallett et al.; Eskridge v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent; Furtak v. New York; McGann v. Richardson, Warden, et al.; McIntosh v. United States; Zanca v. Maimonides Hospital, 1966 — 383 U.S. 922 · caselaw · US