Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. et al. v. Becker, Collector of Internal Revenue, 1941 — 314 U.S. 625 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. et al. v. Becker, Collector of Internal Revenue
314 U.S. 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 351.
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. et al. v. Becker, Collector of Internal Revenue.
October 13, 1941.
Messrs. Daniel N. Kirby and Harry W. Kroeger for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Miss Helen B. Carloss and Mr. Paul R. Russell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.