Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The American Trust and Savings Bank of Chicago et al., as Trustees under a Mortgage of The Marcellus Electric Railway Company, Appellants, v. The Crown Mills et al., Respondents, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
The American Trust and Savings Bank of Chicago et al., as Trustees under a Mortgage of The Marcellus Electric Railway Company, Appellants, v. The Crown Mills et al., Respondents
180 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The American Trust and Savings Bank of Chicago et al., as Trustees under a Mortgage of The Marcellus Electric Railway Company, Appellants, v. The Crown Mills et al., Respondents.
American Trust & Savings Bank v. The Grown Mills. 87 App. Div. 610, affirmed.
(Argued January 16, 1905;
decided January 31, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 6, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of-defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
C. W. Andrews for appellants.
C. G. Baldwin and Elisha B. Powell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.