Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel C. Reed, Respondent, v. Francis E. Trowbridge, Appellant, 1887 — 106 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel C. Reed, Respondent, v. Francis E. Trowbridge, Appellant
106 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel C. Reed, Respondent, v. Francis E. Trowbridge, Appellant.
Where the cause of action stated in a complaint, which was for more than $500, was put in issue and contested on the trial and was allowed by the jury, but the recovery was for less than that sum because of the application of an undisputed counter-claim. Held, the amount in controversy was for more than $500, and the case was appealable to this court.
(Argued June 7, 1887;
decided June 14, 1887.)
This was a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment on the ground that the amount in controversy was less than $500.
The following is the mem. of opinion:
11 The amount in controversy is the sum of $1,465.47, which the jury allow to the plaintiff.' His right to receive that sum was strenuously disputed and resisted by the defendant. The jury gave the plaintiff a verdict of only $200.47; but that balance was reached, by applying in diminution of the $1,465.47, the undisputed counter-claim of the defendant, amounting to the sum of $1,265; but for the allowance by the jury of the $1,465.47, the defendant would have had judgment for his counter-claim. The matter in controversy, therefore, under section 191 of the Code, is more than $500, and the case is appealable to this court.
“ Motion denied, with $10 costs.”
Theodore F. Miller' for motion.
D. M. Porter opposed.
[MAJORITY — Per Guriam]
Per Guriam
mem. for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.