Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stephen A. Ralli et al., Petitioners, v. The Direct Navigation Company; and P. C. Heineken et al., Petitioners, v. The Direct Navigation Company, 1905 — 198 U.S. 586 · caselaw · US
General
Stephen A. Ralli et al., Petitioners, v. The Direct Navigation Company; and P. C. Heineken et al., Petitioners, v. The Direct Navigation Company
198 U.S. 586·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 639.
Stephen A. Ralli et al., Petitioners, v. The Direct Navigation Company; and P. C. Heineken et al., Petitioners, v. The Direct Navigation Company.
No. 640.
May 15, 1905.
Mr. John F. Lewis, Mr. Francis S. Laws and Mr. James B. Stubbs for petitioners.
Mr. M. F. Mott for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of"Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.