Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Globe Printing Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel B. Cook, 1911 — 220 U.S. 603 · caselaw · US
General
Globe Printing Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel B. Cook
220 U.S. 603·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 596.
Globe Printing Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel B. Cook.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 13, 1911.
Decided March 20, 1911.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Kaufman v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116, and cases cited; Kansas City Star Com pany v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, 590, and cases cited in last paragraph. Mr. Edward C. Crow and Mr. Hannis Taylor for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. John H. Atwood for the defendant in error.