Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Shafarman, Appellant, v. Max Jacobs, Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 699 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Shafarman, Appellant, v. Max Jacobs, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
157 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Shafarman, Appellant, v. Max Jacobs, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
Shafarnian v. Jacobs, 15 Misc. Rep. 10, affirmed.
(Submitted October 27, 1898;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late Superior Court of the city of New York, entered December 20, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of the defendant Max Jacobs, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.
Louis Manheim, for appellant.
Max Altmayer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.