Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1945 — 323 U.S. 808 · caselaw · US
General
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
323 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 296.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
January 3, 1945.
Messrs. Ira Lloyd Letts, John S. L. Yost, D. H. Culton, and Samuel H. Biggs for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing, is granted. The petition for rehearing is granted and the order entered November 13, ante, p. 700, is vacated. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted limited to questions 2 and 3 presented by the petition for the writ.