General
In the Matter of the Application of Theodor G. Lurman, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus Directed to The Coffee Exchange of the City of New York, Appellant
149 N.Y. 588·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Theodor G. Lurman, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus Directed to The Coffee Exchange of the City of New York, Appellant.
Matter of Lurman, 90 Hun, 303, affirmed.
(Argued April 20, 1896 ;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 18,1895, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a writ of peremptory mandamus and directed that the writ issue.
Edward M. Shepard for appellant.
Charles Stewart Davison for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed on opinion of General Term, with costs.
All concur.