Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Durr, 1949 — 336 U.S. 941 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Durr
336 U.S. 941·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 4, 1949.
Per Curiam Decisions.
No. 476.
Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Durr.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner. J. H. Thayer Martin for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion of the Solicitor General for remand of this case is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for consideration of the effect of § 209 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 193, 200, as amended by § 206 of the Act of March 30, 1949, 63 Stat. 18, 29, and the eviction regulations of the Housing Expediter issued pursuant thereto, 14 Fed. Reg. 1571.