Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Horace Chase, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Leonard H. Phillips and Samuel C. Lawrence, Trustees, 1912 — 223 U.S. 715 · caselaw · US
General
Horace Chase, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Leonard H. Phillips and Samuel C. Lawrence, Trustees
223 U.S. 715·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 554.
Horace Chase, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Leonard H. Phillips and Samuel C. Lawrence, Trustees.
In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 22, 1912.
Decided February 19, 1912.
Mr- Richard Y. FitzGerald for the plaintiff in error. Mr. J. L. Thorndike and Mr. E. R. Thayer for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 235-236; Chase v. Phillips, 216 U. S. 616.