Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kelsie MORRISON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1925 — 6 F.2d 811 · caselaw · US
General
Kelsie MORRISON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
6 F.2d 811·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kelsie MORRISON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
May 9, 1925.)
No. 6408.
In Error to the District Court of the Unified States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotterai, Judge.
H. P. White, of Pawhuska, Okl. (William Pfeiffer, of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
Before SANBORN and. KENYON, Circuit Judges, and BOOTH, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — BOOTH, District Judge.]
BOOTH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted, tried, and convicted for having in their possession, on or about the 13th of August, 1921, intoxicating liquor “in and upon the Indian country, to wit, Osage county, Oklahoma.”
The questions involved are identical with those considered and disposed of in No. 6489, Browning v. United States, 6 F.(2d) 801, decision filed May 9, 1925. The holding in that ease is conclusive of this.
Judgment affirmed.