Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McNally v. Teets, Warden, 1956 — 352 U.S. 886 · caselaw · US
General
McNally v. Teets, Warden
352 U.S. 886·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 751,
Misc.,
October Term, 1955.
McNally v. Teets, Warden.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing is granted. The order of June 4, 1956, denying certiorari, 351 U. S. 972, is vacated. Treating the papers filed as a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of California in its case No. 5884, decided April 18, 1956, as well as in its case No. 5783, decided February 28, 1956, certiorari is denied in both cases. [No. 5783 reported below, 46 Cal. 2d 307, 293 P. 2d 777. No. 5884 unreported.]