General
Emma Thomas et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph P. Blair et al.
196 U.S. 637·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 388.
Emma Thomas et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph P. Blair et al.
In error to the Supreme.Court of the State of Louisiana.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 30, 1905.
Mr. George Denegre and Mr. Charles Payne Fenner in support of motions.
Mr. John G. Johnson, Mr. Elihu Root, Mr. Henry L. Lazarus and Mr. Henry Denis opposing.
Decided February 20, 1905.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Marrow v. Brinkley, 129 U. S. 178; Israel v. Arthur, 152 U. S. 355, 362; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641.