Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate for the Purpose of the Sanitary Protection of the Source of Water Supply of the City of New York. Thomas E. Raymond et al., Appellants; Lewis E. Cole et al., Respondents, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 571 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate for the Purpose of the Sanitary Protection of the Source of Water Supply of the City of New York. Thomas E. Raymond et al., Appellants; Lewis E. Cole et al., Respondents
192 N.Y. 571·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate for the Purpose of the Sanitary Protection of the Source of Water Supply of the City of New York. Thomas E. Raymond et al., Appellants; Lewis E. Cole et al., Respondents.
Matter of Daly, 123 App. Div. 709, affirmed.
(Argued May 19, 1908;
decided June 2, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 24, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners in condemnation proceedings.
Lewis H. Freedman, Artemas H. Holmes and John L. Jones, Jr., for appellants.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and I. J. Beaudrias of counsel), for city of New York, respondent.
Arthur M. Johnson for Lewis E. Cole et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.