General
CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
392 U.S. 659·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Howard T. Rosen and William J. O’Shaughnessy for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.