Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob Weeks Cornwell, Appellant, v. William A. Parke et al., Respondents, 1890 — 123 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob Weeks Cornwell, Appellant, v. William A. Parke et al., Respondents
123 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob Weeks Cornwell, Appellant, v. William A. Parke et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 14, 1890;
decided October 28, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 24, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit and modified, and affirmed as modified, an order granting an extra allowance.
Flamen B. Candler for appellant.
Edward M. Shepard for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.