Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NORTHWESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MARTIN; SAME v. WELLBORN, 1878 — 154 U.S. 640 · caselaw · US
General
NORTHWESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MARTIN; SAME v. WELLBORN
154 U.S. 64024 L. Ed. 542·Supreme Court of the United States·1878
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTHWESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MARTIN. SAME v. WELLBORN.
ERROR to THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.'
Nos. 1009 and 1008.
Submitted December 17, 1877.
Decided January 7, 1878.
Thompson v. Butler, 95 U. S. 694, followed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. TVra. P. Lynde and Mr. L. D. McKisick for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Josiah Patterson for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
announced the decision of the court.
Verdicts having been rendered in each of these cases against the plaintiff in error (the defendant below) for more than five thousand dollars, the plaintiffs respectively remitted all over that sum, and judgments were entered by the court, against the remonstrance of the defendant for five thousand dollars and no more. The cases having been brought here by the defendant below, the defendants in error (plaintiffs below) moved to dismiss because the amount in controversy is not sufficient to give us jurisdiction.
• The question thus presented has just been decided in Thompson v. Butler, 95 U. S. 694, and the motions are granted for the reasons stated in the opinion read in that case.