Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary E. S. De Grauw, as Executrix of Aaron A. De Grauw, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Long Island Electric Railway Company et al., Respondents, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 597 · caselaw · US
General
Mary E. S. De Grauw, as Executrix of Aaron A. De Grauw, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Long Island Electric Railway Company et al., Respondents
163 N.Y. 597·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary E. S. De Grauw, as Executrix of Aaron A. De Grauw, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Long Island Electric Railway Company et al., Respondents.
Be Orame v. Long Island El. By. Go., 43 App. Div. 502, affirmed.
(Argued June 4, 1900;
decided June 19, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered January 23, 1900, upon an order of the Appellate Division in the second judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment entered upon a decision of the Special Term sustaining demurrers to the complaint.
F. II. Ycm Yeohten for appellant.
Chandes A. Collin, Edward M. Croat, William E Sheehan and Alfred W. Kiddle for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
•Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Landon, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.