Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Justus Heilbronn et al., Respondents, v. Abraham S. Herzog, Appellant, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 520 · caselaw · US
General
Justus Heilbronn et al., Respondents, v. Abraham S. Herzog, Appellant
187 N.Y. 520·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Justus Heilbronn et al., Respondents, v. Abraham S. Herzog, Appellant.
Heilbronn v. Herzog, 103 App. Div. 595, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1906;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 16, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for goods sold and delivered.
Julius J. Frank for appellant.
Benjmnin N. Cardozo and Meyer M. Friend for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen. Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.