Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Richard J. Rogers, Appellant, v. Village of Attica, Respondent, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Richard J. Rogers, Appellant, v. Village of Attica, Respondent
188 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard J. Rogers, Appellant, v. Village of Attica, Respondent.
(Argued April 29, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Rogers v. Village of Attica, 113 App. Div. 603, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Ajipellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 10, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action to restrain the defendant from changing the grade of a street.
Russell J. Slone for appellant.
Elmer E. Charles and Willis E. Iloplcins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.