Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Good, Respondent, v. William S. Daland et al., Appellants, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
John Good, Respondent, v. William S. Daland et al., Appellants
117 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Good, Respondent, v. William S. Daland et al., Appellants.
(Argued October 8, 1889;
decided October 29, 1889.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made June 28, 1889, which affirmed a judgment of the Special Term overruling separate demurrers of the defendants to the complaint.
Calvin Frost for motion.
Albert G. MacDonald opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.