Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Philip F. Olwell, an Elector of the City of New York, Respondent, to Strike Certain Names from the Register of Voters of the Sixth Election District of the Ninth Assembly District in Said City. Thomas S. Carter et al., Appellants, 1901 — 165 N.Y. 642 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Philip F. Olwell, an Elector of the City of New York, Respondent, to Strike Certain Names from the Register of Voters of the Sixth Election District of the Ninth Assembly District in Said City. Thomas S. Carter et al., Appellants
165 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Philip F. Olwell, an Elector of the City of New York, Respondent, to Strike Certain Names from the Register of Voters of the Sixth Election District of the Ninth Assembly District in Said City. Thomas S. Carter et al., Appellants.
Matter of Olwell, 54 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Argued January 7, 1901;
decided January 22, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 1, 1900, affirming an order of Special Term striking-certain names from the register of voters of the sixth election district of the ninth assembly district in the city of New York.
Henry W. Taft and George W. Wickersham for appellants.
Edward Browne for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.