Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Stone's Express, Inc.; and St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc. et al. v. Stone's Express, Inc., 1955 — 350 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
General
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Stone's Express, Inc.; and St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc. et al. v. Stone's Express, Inc.
350 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 5, 1955.
No. 9.
No. 14.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Stone’s Express, Inc.; and St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc. et al. v. Stone’s Express, Inc.
Robert W. Ginnane for appellant in No. 9. S. Harrison Kahn for appellants in No. 14. Herbert Burstein for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Probable jurisdiction noted, 348 U. S. 886.
Per Curiam:
The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the District Court for dismissal of the proceedings in accordance with the stipulation of the parties as to mootness.