General
Winfield H. Bossout, Respondent, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant
126 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Winfield H. Bossout, Respondent, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 13, 1891;
decided April 14, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made July 1, 1890, which reversed a judgment entered upon an order dismissing; the complaint on trial at Circuit 'and granted a new trial.
William H. Gilman for appellant.
D. G. Griffim for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed and judgment absolute ordered on stipulation for plaintiff.