Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
De Wagenknecht et al. v. Stinnes et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 830 · caselaw · US
General
De Wagenknecht et al. v. Stinnes et al.
355 U.S. 830·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 279.
De Wagenknecht et al. v. Stinnes et al.
Ralph G. Albrecht, John Geyer Tausig, Gerald J. McMahon and Henry F. Butler for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel for Attorney General Brownell, and John W. Pehle for Stinnes, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.