Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph LOWE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph S. HOPPER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, 1975 — 520 F.2d 1405 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph LOWE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph S. HOPPER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
520 F.2d 1405·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GODBOLD and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph LOWE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph S. HOPPER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 75-2270
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 24, 1975.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 24, 1975.
John J. Sullivan, Savannah, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.
Arthur R. Bolton, Atty. Gen., John B. Ballard, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondentappellee.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GODBOLD and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s final order, reported as Lowe v. Hopper, S.D.Ga., 1975, 400 F.Supp. 970.