Securities
Elmer H. Duffield, Appellant, v. Henry F. Ashurst, as District Attorney, etc.
225 U.S. 697·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 231.
Elmer H. Duffield, Appellant, v. Henry F. Ashurst, as District Attorney, etc.
Appeal from' the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona.
Argued April 26, 1912.
Decided April 29, 1912.
Mr. T. J. Norton, Mr. Gardiner Lathrop, and Mr. Robert Dunlap for the appellant. Mr. Edward M. Doe for the appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appeal dismissed with costs. United States ex rel. Warden v. Chandler, 122 U. S. 643; Bernardin v. Butterworth, 169 U. S. 600; Security Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Prewitt, 200 U. S. 446, 449, and cases cited, and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the; State of Arizona.