Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eliza A. Wall, Plaintiff in Error, v. Old Colony Trust Company et al., 1902 — 187 U.S. 637 · caselaw · US
General
Eliza A. Wall, Plaintiff in Error, v. Old Colony Trust Company et al.
187 U.S. 637·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 361.
Eliza A. Wall, Plaintiff in Error, v. Old Colony Trust Company et al.
In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted November 3, 1902.
Decided November 10, 1902.
Mr. L. L. Soaife for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Felix Baokemmin, Mr. Moorfeld Story, Mr. Ezra R. Thayer, Mr. J. L. Thorndike and Mr. L. S. Dahney for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; and see Wall v. Old Colony Trust Company, 174 Massachusetts, 340; 177 Massachusetts, 275.