Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David M. H. Place, Respondent, v. Georgiana Estelle Kennedy, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
David M. H. Place, Respondent, v. Georgiana Estelle Kennedy, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
183 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David M. H. Place, Respondent, v. Georgiana Estelle Kennedy, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
(Argued October 13, 1905;
decided October 27, 1905.)
Place v. Kennedy, 89 App. Div. 167, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January Y, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at Special Term after a verdict in an action for partition.
Edward L. Blackman and Alfred B. Cruikshank for appellant.
Burton C. Meighan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the judgment appealed from is not final; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien and Haight, JJ.