Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Domingio Isaias TAX-GARCIA, aka Domingo Isaias Tax-Garcia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; Jose Luis Rueda-Castañeda, aka Jose Luis Rueda Castañeda, petitioner, v. United States; and Jesus Mora-Fernandez, petitioner, v. United States., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 2291 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Domingio Isaias TAX-GARCIA, aka Domingo Isaias Tax-Garcia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; Jose Luis Rueda-Castañeda, aka Jose Luis Rueda Castañeda, petitioner, v. United States; and Jesus Mora-Fernandez, petitioner, v. United States.
134 S. Ct. 2291189 L. Ed. 2d 169·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Domingio Isaias TAX-GARCIA, aka Domingo Isaias Tax-Garcia, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES; Jose Luis Rueda-Castañeda, aka Jose Luis Rueda Castañeda, petitioner,
v.
United States; and Jesus Mora-Fernandez, petitioner,
v.
United States.
No. 13-8627.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 19, 2014.
Case below, 544 Fed.Appx. 564; 547 Fed.Appx. 521; 548 Fed.Appx. 165.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner Domingio Isaias Tax-Garcia, aka Domingo Isaias Tax-Garcia for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on April 8, 2014.