General
Y. M. WEE v. EMMA M. NAKUINA, ET AL.
29 Haw. 20·Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii·1926·HI
Perry, C. J., Lindsay and Banks, JJ.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Y. M. WEE v. EMMA M. NAKUINA, ET AL.
No. 1614.
Appeal from Circuit Judge First .Circuit.
Hon. F. Andrade, Judge.
Argued March 17, 1926.
Decided March 22, 1926.
Perry, C. J., Lindsay and Banks, JJ.
A. G. M. Robertson (Robertson & Castle and W. J. Robinson on the brief) for petitioner-appellee.
A. G. Smith (Smith & Wild on the briefs) for respondents-appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a decree requiring the appellants, mortgagors, in a suit to foreclose a mortgage, to pay to the appellee, mortgagee, an attorney’s fee in the sum of $750. The essential facts before us are so similar to those in Bowen v. Nakuina, 21 Haw. 470, as to render that case entirely applicable and upon this authority the decree of the court below is affirmed.