Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nancy E. Gilkinson, 1912 — 226 U.S. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nancy E. Gilkinson
226 U.S. 624·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 96.
Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nancy E. Gilkinson.
In error to the Appellate Court of the State of Indiana.
July 31, 1912.
Mr. Samuel O. Pickens, Mr. Robert Franklin Davidson, Mr. George H. Fearons, Mr. Rush Taggart and Mr. Francis Raymond Stark for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles W. Hiller for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed pursuant to the-28th Rule.