Contracts · MBE-tested
Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell et al.
319 U.S. 73287 L. Ed. 1694·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 28.
Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell et al.
Argued October 19, 20, 1943.
Reargued March 8, 9, 1943.
Decided June 14, 1943.
Mr. John Dickinson, with whom Messrs. Guy W. Knight and John B. Prizer were on the briefs, for petitioner. Mr. Willard H. McEwen, with whom Messrs. Frank L. Mulholland, Clarence M. Mulholland, and Harold C. Heiss were on the briefs, for respondents. By special leave of Court, Mr. Robert L. Stern, with whom Solicitor General Fahy was on the brief, for the United States, as amicus curiae,
on the reargument.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.