Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HOSFORD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Corporation, Claimant of "G. K. WENTWORTH," Her Engines, etc., v. FAIRFIELD STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, a Corporation, et al., 1932 — 57 F.2d 1078 · caselaw · US
Corporations
HOSFORD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Corporation, Claimant of "G. K. WENTWORTH," Her Engines, etc., v. FAIRFIELD STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, a Corporation, et al.
57 F.2d 1078·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HOSFORD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Corporation, Claimant of “G. K. WENTWORTH,” Her Engines, etc., v. FAIRFIELD STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, a Corporation, et al.
No. 6773.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 19, 1932.
Platt, Platt, Fales, Smith & Black, of Portland, Or., for appellant.
Wood, Montague & Matthiessen, of Portland, Or., for appellees.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of proctors for respective parties. Ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.