Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ex parte: In the Matter of The Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner, 1910 — 218 U.S. 668 · caselaw · US
General
Ex parte: In the Matter of The Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner
218 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 11,
Original.
Ex parte: In the Matter of The Cudahy Packing Company, Petitioner.
Argued November 28, 1910.
Decided December 5, 1910.
Mr. Ralph W. Breckenridge and Mr. Charles J. Greene for petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of mandamus denied, rule discharged, and petition dismissed, on the authority of In re Pennsylvania Company, Petitioner &c., 137 U. S. 451.
Mr. Constantine J. Smyth and Mr. Edward P. Smith for respondent.