Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Washington County v. Durant, 1868 — 74 U.S. 694 · caselaw · US
General
Washington County v. Durant
74 U.S. 6947 Wall. 694·Supreme Court of the United States·1868
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Washington County v. Durant.
Cases cannot be brought within the appellate jurisdiction of this court by agreement of parties, and .without an appeal allowed or writ/ of error served.
TiiE'record showed that this cause had been brought here from the Circuit Court for Iowa, as on a writ of error,'62/ agreement of parties, and without the issuing pr service of such a writ. Coming before this court on a printed argument for the defendant in error, and the fact above-mentioned being observed by the court, the appeal was dismissed ;
Decided at December Term, 1865.
[MAJORITY — the CHIEF JUSTICE]
the CHIEF JUSTICE
stating it to be the opinion of the court, that an appeal allowed or a writ of error served, was essential to the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction.