General
John Chadwick, Respondent, v. Decimus R. Burrows et al., Appellants
115 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Chadwick, Respondent, v. Decimus R. Burrows et al., Appellants.
(Submitted June 27, 1889;
decided October 8, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 22,1886, which modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision on trial at- Special Term.
George Wing for appellants.
A. K. Potter for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on the ground that the judgment appealed from and the sole matter in controversy, excluding costs, are less than $500; no opinion.
AH concur.
Appeal dismissed.