Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hicks, District Attorney of Orange County, et al. v. Miranda, dba Walnut Properties, et al., 1975 — 420 U.S. 920 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hicks, District Attorney of Orange County, et al. v. Miranda, dba Walnut Properties, et al.
420 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.*
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 74-156.
Hicks, District Attorney of Orange County, et al. v. Miranda, dba Walnut Properties, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 419 U. S. 1018.] Motions for additional time for oral argument granted and appellants allotted 15 additional minutes for that purpose. Appel-lees also allotted 15 additional minutes for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.*