Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Marion Cartwright, Appellant, v. The City of Cohoes et al., Respondents, 1901 — 165 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
Marion Cartwright, Appellant, v. The City of Cohoes et al., Respondents
165 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marion Cartwright, Appellant, v. The City of Cohoes et al., Respondents.
Cartwright v. City of Cohoes, 39 App. Div. 69, affirmed.
(Argued December 13, 1900;
decided January 8, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 15, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
Lewis E. Carr for appellant.
Isaiah Fellows, Jr., and Henry A. Strong for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with one hill of costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Landon, J.