Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Puerto Rico Cement Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co., 1944 — 323 U.S. 756 · caselaw · US
General
Puerto Rico Cement Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.
323 U.S. 756·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 232.
Puerto Rico Cement Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.
October 23, 1944.
Mr. L. E. Dubon for petitioner.
Mr. Roscoe Walsworth for respondent. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Abraham, J. Harris filed a brief on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.