Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Castle Brothers, Respondent, v. James Graham, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 581 · caselaw · US
General
Castle Brothers, Respondent, v. James Graham, Appellant
177 N.Y. 581·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Castle Brothers, Respondent, v. James Graham, Appellant.
Reported below, 87 App. Div. 97.
(Argued February 8, 1904;
decided February 16, 1904.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 26, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
The motion was made upon the ground that permission to appeal had not been granted by the appellate Division' nor by a judge of the Court of Appeals.
Frank A. Doyle for motion.
Diehard Krause opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.